Death Penalty Thesis Statement: Is Capital Punishment Outdated?

The death penalty has been used as a capital punishment for centuries to punish those who commit heinous crimes. This calls for an eye for an eye justice system and achieves retribution for the victim. We have a death penalty thesis statement here to look this matter through. 

Death Penalty as a Deterrent Effect

The use of the death penalty dates back to ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Babylon, and Rome. The earliest recorded implementation of the death penalty is 18th Century BCE from the Code of Hammurabi. The code established the death penalty for 25 crimes.

Ever since then up to now; there have been various methods of execution such as impalement, burning alive, hanging, beating to death, drowning, and cruxification. 

Death penalty as a form of punishment has been subject to debate. Many argue that the death penalty is not effective. The death row is for capital crimes such as high-level frauds, adultery, murder, and rape.

Those who are in favour of the death penalty argue that severe punishments are necessary for the betterment of civilization. Many modern activists explain that the death penalty should be abolishment and there should be a separate punishment for a crime that now asks for death.

Thesis Statement

The death penalty is not suitable for minor offences but it is effective deterrence for capital crimes.

Body

1. Fear as a Useful Tool

The psychological impact of fear is both a useful and practical approach. Losing one’s life is finally; it surpasses the terror of life imprisonment or other penalties. The capital punishment’s fearsome impact surely lessens the numbers of murderers, rapists, and terrorists.

Criminologists agree with the idea that while it is severe, the practice deters many individuals from carrying out such crimes. The use of capital punishment sends a powerful message that the most severe crimes are to be met with the harshest penalties.

2. Empirical Evidence Favoruing the Effect of Capital Punishment

The idea that the death penalty should be abolished can easily be refuted through empirical evidence. There is a direct correlation between reduced crimes against the number of times criminals were executed.

Researchers at Emory University found out that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to the point it prevents 18 murders on average. Even in the current scenario, countries that have implemented the death penalty as the ultimate punishment see downfalls in violent crimes in comparison to the countries where the death penalty is not practised.

3. Societal Safety and Justice for Victims

The death penalty deters serious crimes and reinforces the idea that most terrifying criminals cannot re-offend. Once you use the death penalty and execute a criminal, the case is closed for them. You did not just deal with a criminal but made an example out of them to teach lessons to society.

The application of the death penalty stops people from committing the very crimes against innocent people and reduces the violation of the fundamental right to life. This is how you can increase the value of human life by strengthening the rule of law and gaining public trust on the matter.

4. Deterrence in Major Cases

In the modern world, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has a rather different take on the capital punishment theory. They argue that it serves no good; that it is barbaric and morally wrong. Well, is it? As if its effectiveness as a deterrent has not proved to decline in the number of major crimes.

The idea that the death penalty is inhumane and should be abolished has inherent flaws. It may seem harsh but it is applied to prevent far harsher acts on humanity. The need is for critical inspection on the rise of criminal offenses when capital punishment was applied against now when it is not.

5. Moral Duty of the State

Protecting its general public is a moral responsibility a state bears. By implementing the capital punishment policy, a state sends a clear message on crime and punishment.

The state should show how the death penalty serves as a deterrent and how there is no practical solution in the absence of the death penalty. Death by the state instills the idea of a practical death penalty in society. An individual may research questions on the death penalty and how the state is answerable to those questions.

To form an understanding of the topic of the death penalty is a necessity. Why is it that we are unable to control violent crimes in the modern world? What do our laws lack? Everyone knows killing is wrong yet the murder and rape of innocent people are now rampant.

That is because the death penalty often is considered merciless. The current values believe the death penalty is barbaric and the person convicted of a capital crime does not deserve it.

This goes to show that the death penalty has undeniable significance. Ever since we have laid low on the death penalty, we have been unable to create a healthy society free of violent crimes.

We have to give the sense of life for a life whether we are talking about the death penalty in America, Asia, Europe, or elsewhere. Only the retention of the death penalty can result in a society free of dangerous criminals.