NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 2 Policy Proposal
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 2 Policy Proposal
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 2 Policy Proposal makes sure that the organization or team follows the requirements regarding staff duties, quality metrics, and patient outcomes.
Benchmark Underperformance Impact
Benchmark underperformance drives severe consequences for health organizations and consequences alike. It essentially means the failure to meet Hb1ac and Foot testing outcomes in a lack of managing adequate monitoring and diabetic patients. This means increased healthcare pricing, decreased patient satisfaction, and bad health sector results.
To maintain quality care for diabetic patients, the need for creating a relevant policy arises. Making this possible through evidence-based practices and guidelines is credible. The practice guidelines and proposed policies are for stakeholder groups, patients, regulatory bodies, insurers, patients, and healthcare bodies.
Summary of Practice Guidelines and New Policy
This organizational policy addresses shortfalls in care plans. These proven guidelines ensure the implementation of Mercy Medical Center’s Hgba1c testing.
The practice guidelines and policy proposals are not only for hba1c and foot evaluations but for awareness campaigns and staff training as well. This involves general knowledge of hba1c and foot assessments and training programs for those who are diagnosed with glycated haemoglobin.
A good policy would include environmental factors as well. The implementation and development of these factors include healthcare services, insurance coverage, and cultural beliefs. The policy proposal Mercy emphasizes policy professors and care law to make sure that the assigned benchmark metric is met.
Impact of Factors
Mercy Medical Center must have a usual hba1c and foot check to find out if the practices are applied according to the plan. This reduces the risk of complications and leads to improved federal healthcare. Another point it emphasizes is the guidelines for the enhancement of care quality and reducing the costs of hba1c and foot testing.
Many adopt these proven guidelines to enhance aimed benchmark performance as well as hospital readmission reduction programs. The practice guidelines are as crucial as access to care for foot accessories and hba1c tests.
Ethical Proven Practice Guidelines
It is crucial to ponder over ethical principles like beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. The delivery of quality based on these elements does not tackle the standardized metric underperformance but assures quality diabetes care and positive results for everyone involved.
These practice guidelines include patient education, regular monitoring, interdisciplinary care, and patient-centered care. These proven guidelines help establish a structure beneficial for the implementation of these tips for diabetic patients as well as for other elements.
This procedure offers points that are significant to consider and gives important solutions for developing and applying these important tips. This method reduces poor patient outcomes and improves quality care.
References
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.022
- https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_177_18
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133117000561
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304844
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.017
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33188-x
- https://repository.unar.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/558
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0310-5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2019.06.002
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30122-7
Research.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.038
Phelan, A., McCormack, B., Dewing, J., Brown, D., Cardiff, S., Cook, N., Dickson, C., Kmete, S., Lorber, M., Magowan, R., McCance, T., Skovdahl, K., Štiglic, G., & van Lieshout, F. (2020). Review of developments in person-centred healthcare. International Practice Development Journal, 10(Suppl2), 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.10suppl2.003
Poger, J. M., Mayer, V., Duru, O. K., Nauman, B., Holderness, H., Warren, N., Vasquez, C., Bibi, S., Rasmussen-Torvik, L. J., Hosseinian, Z., Shi, L., Wallace, J., Goytia, C. N., Horowitz, C. R., & Kraschnewski, J. L. (2020). Network engagement in action. Medical Care, 58, S66–S74.
https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001264
Top Grades Guarrantied
